Full Game List

79
Utah Win Probability: 1.0%
Team Pages
UMass
Utah
Time Team Play UTAH Win Prob.
Q4 0:01 Saved Shot 1.0%
Q4 0:01 Saved Shot 1.0%
Q4 0:17 Faceoff Win 1.1%
Q4 0:17 Faceoff Win 1.1%
UTAH: 7MASS: 9
UTAH: 7MASS: 9
Q4 0:17 Assisted Goal 1.1%
Q4 0:17 Assisted Goal 1.1%
Q4 0:50 Faceoff Win 1.2%
Q4 0:50 Faceoff Win 1.2%
UTAH: 6MASS: 9
UTAH: 6MASS: 9
Q4 0:50 Assisted Goal 1.2%
Q4 0:50 Assisted Goal 1.2%
Q4 1:03 Missed Shot 1.3%
Q4 1:03 Missed Shot 1.3%
Q4 1:25 Unforced Turnover 1.3%
Q4 1:25 Unforced Turnover 1.3%
Q4 1:31 Ground Ball 1.4%
Q4 1:31 Ground Ball 1.4%
Q4 1:37 Ground Ball 1.4%
Q4 1:37 Ground Ball 1.4%
Q4 1:43 Good Clear 1.4%
Q4 1:43 Good Clear 1.4%
Q4 1:52 Unforced Turnover 1.5%
Q4 1:52 Unforced Turnover 1.5%
Q4 1:55 Good Clear 1.5%
Q4 1:55 Good Clear 1.5%
Q4 2:14 Unforced Turnover 1.5%
Q4 2:14 Unforced Turnover 1.5%
Q4 2:17 Ground Ball 1.6%
Q4 2:17 Ground Ball 1.6%
Q4 2:26 Good Clear 1.6%
Q4 2:26 Good Clear 1.6%
Q4 2:44 Forced Turnover 1.7%
Q4 2:44 Forced Turnover 1.7%
Q4 3:41 Faceoff Win 1.9%
Q4 3:41 Faceoff Win 1.9%
UTAH: 5MASS: 9
UTAH: 5MASS: 9
Q4 3:41 Unassisted Goal 1.9%
Q4 3:41 Unassisted Goal 1.9%
Q4 3:52 Missed Shot 1.9%
Q4 3:52 Missed Shot 1.9%
Q4 4:29 Good Clear 2.1%
Q4 4:29 Good Clear 2.1%
Q4 4:39 Forced Turnover 2.1%
Q4 4:39 Forced Turnover 2.1%
Q4 5:23 Good Clear 2.3%
Q4 5:23 Good Clear 2.3%
Q4 5:33 Unforced Turnover 2.4%
Q4 5:33 Unforced Turnover 2.4%
Q4 6:03 Good Clear 2.5%
Q4 6:03 Good Clear 2.5%
Q4 6:16 Forced Turnover 2.5%
Q4 6:16 Forced Turnover 2.5%
Q4 6:35 Good Clear 2.6%
Q4 6:35 Good Clear 2.6%
Q4 6:53 Ground Ball 2.7%
Q4 6:53 Ground Ball 2.7%
Show All Plays

Summary Stats
MASS
UTAH
Goals
9
7
Possessions
42
44
Shots
35
26
Shots-on-Goal
15
13
Off. Efficiency
21.4%
15.9%
Assist Rate
67%
71%
Save Pct
46.2%
40.0%
Shooting Percentage
25.7%
26.9%
Shot-on-goal Rate
42.9%
50.0%
Faceoff Win Rate
42.1%
57.9%
Turnovers
18
23
Failed Clears
4
1
Groundballs
9
6
Time of Possession
54.7%
45.3%
Avg. Possession Length
45.4
35.9
Time to First Shot
34.0
27.9
Shots per Possession
0.83
0.59
Number of Contributors
18
16
By Quarter: UMass
 
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Goals
2
2
5
0
Possessions
9
9
13
11
Shots
5
12
11
7
Shots-on-Goal
3
3
5
4
Off. Efficiency
22%
22%
38%
0%
Save Pct
80%
0%
0%
40%
Shooting Percentage
40%
17%
45%
0%
Shot-on-goal Rate
60%
25%
45%
57%
Faceoff Win Rate
25%
40%
50%
50%
Groundball Win Rate
67%
0%
75%
57%
Turnover Rate
44%
44%
31%
55%
Time of Possession
53%
52%
58%
56%
Avg. Possession Length
46.3
52.8
40.7
44.3
Time to First Shot
39.0
36.6
31.9
28.2
Shots per Possession
0.56
1.33
0.85
0.64
Assist Rate
50%
50%
80%
0%
By Quarter: Utah
 
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Goals
1
2
1
3
Possessions
12
10
10
12
Shots
9
4
6
7
Shots-on-Goal
5
2
1
5
Off. Efficiency
8%
20%
10%
25%
Save Pct
33%
33%
0%
100%
Shooting Percentage
11%
50%
17%
43%
Shot-on-goal Rate
56%
50%
17%
71%
Faceoff Win Rate
75%
60%
50%
50%
Groundball Win Rate
33%
100%
25%
43%
Turnover Rate
50%
60%
60%
42%
Time of Possession
47%
48%
42%
44%
Avg. Possession Length
31.3
44.2
38.1
31.8
Time to First Shot
17.6
28.7
38.0
29.8
Shots per Possession
0.75
0.40
0.60
0.58
Assist Rate
100%
50%
100%
67%
Summary Stats
MASS
UTAH
Goals
9
7
Poss.
42
44
Shots
35
26
Shots-on-Goal
15
13
Off. Eff%
21.4%
15.9%
Assist %
67%
71%
Save Pct
46.2%
40.0%
Shooting %
25.7%
26.9%
SOG %
42.9%
50.0%
FO Win %
42.1%
57.9%
Turnovers
18
23
Failed Clears
4
1
Groundballs
9
6
T.O.P.
54.7%
45.3%
Avg Poss Length
45.4
35.9
Time to 1st Shot
34.0
27.9
Shots / Poss
0.83
0.59
# of Contributors
18
16
By Quarter: UMass
 
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Goals
2
2
5
0
Poss.
9
9
13
11
Shots
5
12
11
7
SOG
3
3
5
4
Off. Eff%
22%
22%
38%
0%
Save Pct
80%
0%
0%
40%
Shooting %
40%
17%
45%
0%
SOG %
60%
25%
45%
57%
FO Win %
25%
40%
50%
50%
GB Win %
67%
0%
75%
57%
Turnover %
44%
44%
31%
55%
T.O.P.
53%
52%
58%
56%
Poss Len.
46.3
52.8
40.7
44.3
Time to 1st
39.0
36.6
31.9
28.2
Shots / Poss
0.56
1.33
0.85
0.64
Assist %
50%
50%
80%
0%
By Quarter: Utah
 
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Goals
1
2
1
3
Poss.
12
10
10
12
Shots
9
4
6
7
SOG
5
2
1
5
Off. Eff%
8%
20%
10%
25%
Save Pct
33%
33%
0%
100%
Shooting %
11%
50%
17%
43%
SOG %
56%
50%
17%
71%
FO Win %
75%
60%
50%
50%
GB Win %
33%
100%
25%
43%
Turnover %
50%
60%
60%
42%
T.O.P.
47%
48%
42%
44%
Poss Len.
31.3
44.2
38.1
31.8
Time to 1st
17.6
28.7
38.0
29.8
Shots / Poss
0.75
0.40
0.60
0.58
Assist %
100%
50%
100%
67%
UMass Utah
Player EGA Player EGA
UMass Utah
Player EGA Player EGA
Kevin Tobin 3.31 Jimmy Perkins 3.31
Kevin Tobin 3.31 Jimmy Perkins 3.31
Jeff Trainor 2.51 Colin Burke 2.98
Jeff Trainor 2.51 Colin Burke 2.98
Gabriel Procyk 1.96 Cole Brams 1.90
Gabriel Procyk 1.96 Cole Brams 1.90

[easy-tweet tweet="According to #LaxWP, @UMassMLacrosse currently has a 99.0% win probability against @UtahLacrosse" user="laxreference" url="https://lacrossereference.com/game-win-probabilities/utah_massachusetts_20200314/?utm_source=Social" template="light"]

LacrosseReference Preview: Utah vs UMass

Tale of the Tape

Stat Category
Utah
UMass
Strength of Record
48th
15th
Lax-ELO Ranking
45th
16th
Adjusted Shooting %
30th
43rd
Adjusted Efficiency
26th
48th
Time of Possession
74th
58th
Roster Depth
39th
42nd
Pace
17th
50th

Team Pages

Style Comparison

Utah Offense
vs.
UMass Defense
UTAH Off: on poss. lasting...
<30 sec.
30-59 sec.
60-80 sec.
Pct of Poss.
29.5%
32.7%
37.8%
Pct of Goals
31.4%
23.5%
45.1%
Efficiency
34.8%
23.5%
39.0%
Ranking
17th
58th
13th
MASS Def: on poss. lasting...
<30 sec.
30-59 sec.
60-80 sec.
Efficiency
39.6%
30.9%
23.2%
Ranking
66th
50th
8th
Utah Defense
vs.
UMass Offense
MASS Off: on poss. lasting...
<30 sec.
30-59 sec.
60-80 sec.
Pct of Poss.
17.4%
44.0%
38.6%
Pct of Goals
14.8%
47.5%
37.7%
Efficiency
21.4%
27.4%
24.7%
Ranking
62nd
43rd
57th
UTAH Def: on poss. lasting...
<30 sec.
30-59 sec.
60-80 sec.
Efficiency
40.9%
26.7%
25.4%
Ranking
69th
26th
17th

Quarter Breakdowns

Utah: Season Stat Splits by Quarter
 
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Offensive Efficiency
35.6%
27.3%
31.1%
35.8%
Scoring Margin
+10
-8
+5
+5
Shooting %
33%
40%
31%
25%
Turnover Rate
44.1%
40.9%
34.4%
30.2%
Shots-on-Goal %
65%
82%
56%
68%
Time-of-Possession
63%
47%
55%
49%
Faceoff Win Rate
52%
62%
41%
47%
Time/Possession
38.3s
28.7s
29.4s
35.1s
Time to First Shot
36.0s
27.2s
25.7s
28.9s
Shots per Possession
1.07
0.66
1.04
1.57
Defensive Efficiency
19.3%
37.7%
23.7%
26.9%
Save Pct
65.6%
46.9%
56.2%
53.3%
UMass: Season Stat Splits by Quarter
 
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Offensive Efficiency
25.3%
24.6%
27.5%
29.2%
Scoring Margin
+2
-1
-7
+8
Shooting %
30%
24%
30%
31%
Turnover Rate
48.1%
40.6%
31.9%
29.2%
Shots-on-Goal %
67%
60%
68%
60%
Time-of-Possession
50%
51%
43%
52%
Faceoff Win Rate
69%
59%
48%
61%
Time/Possession
42.9s
44.5s
42.6s
43.1s
Time to First Shot
26.2s
24.4s
30.8s
29.8s
Shots per Possession
0.94
1.07
1.00
0.96
Defensive Efficiency
26.5%
27.7%
37.7%
22.4%
Save Pct
53.8%
53.8%
39.5%
62.9%

EGA Leaders

Utah
UMass
Offensive Leaders
Offensive Leaders
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Colin Burke
22
▼11
Jimmy Perkins
140
▼36
Mac Costin
164
▼69
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Jeff Trainor
59
▼6
Billy Philpott
80
▼26
Kevin Tobin
144
▼4
Defensive Leaders
Defensive Leaders
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Sammy Cambere
23
▲15
Seth Neeleman
77
▲34
Nick Hapney
178
▲78
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Jackson Suboch
50
▼19
Jake Dulac
117
▼13
Adam Towey
179
▲106
Faceoff Leaders
Faceoff Leaders
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Cole Brams
24
▼14
Donny Stock
430
▼69
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Zack Hochman
12
▼4
Nolan Enneguess
839
▼80
Nat'l Rank refers to the player's ranking nationally within the offensive/defensive/faceoff category. Change indicates how that ranking has changed in the past week. Check out all the leaders here.

Trending Up or Down

Utah
UMass
Stat
Previous 3 games
Last 3 games
Previous 3 games
Last 3 games
Record
1 - 2
2 - 1
2 - 1
3 - 0
Save Pct
50%
58%
55%
54%
Offensive Efficiency
30%
34%
24%
34%
Shooting Pct
28%
34%
25%
34%
Defensive Efficiency
29%
26%
23%
30%
Face-off Win%
52%
52%
60%
56%
Turnover Rate
38%
37%
39%
31%
Time-of-Possession
45%
53%
47%
52%
Avg Possession Length
18.9s
44.8s
36.9s
41.0s

Utah vs UMass

Tale of the Tape

Stat
Utah
UMass
Strength of Rec.
48th
15th
Lax-ELO Rank
45th
16th
Adj Shooting %
30th
43rd
Adj Efficiency
26th
48th
T.O.P.
74th
58th
Roster Depth
39th
42nd
Pace
17th
50th

Team Pages

Quarter Breakdowns

Utah: Season Stat Splits by Quarter
 
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Off Eff %
35.6%
27.3%
31.1%
35.8%
Scoring Margin
+10
-8
+5
+5
Shooting %
33%
40%
31%
25%
Turnover %
44.1%
40.9%
34.4%
30.2%
SOG %
65%
82%
56%
68%
TOP %
63%
47%
55%
49%
FO Win %
52%
62%
41%
47%
Time/Poss
38.3s
28.7s
29.4s
35.1s
Time to 1st
36.0s
27.2s
25.7s
28.9s
Shots/Poss
1.07
0.66
1.04
1.57
Def. Eff %
19.3%
37.7%
23.7%
26.9%
Save %
65.6%
46.9%
56.2%
53.3%
UMass: Season Stat Splits by Quarter
 
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Off Eff %
25.3%
24.6%
27.5%
29.2%
Scoring Margin
+2
-1
-7
+8
Shooting %
30%
24%
30%
31%
Turnover %
48.1%
40.6%
31.9%
29.2%
SOG %
67%
60%
68%
60%
TOP %
50%
51%
43%
52%
FO Win %
69%
59%
48%
61%
Time/Poss
42.9s
44.5s
42.6s
43.1s
Time to 1st
26.2s
24.4s
30.8s
29.8s
Shots/Poss
0.94
1.07
1.00
0.96
Def. Eff %
26.5%
27.7%
37.7%
22.4%
Save %
53.8%
53.8%
39.5%
62.9%

EGA Leaders

Utah
Offensive Leaders
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Colin Burke
22
▼11
Jimmy Perkins
140
▼36
Mac Costin
164
▼69
Defensive Leaders
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Sammy Cambere
23
▲15
Seth Neeleman
77
▲34
Nick Hapney
178
▲78
Faceoff Leaders
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Cole Brams
24
▼14
Donny Stock
430
▼69
UMass
Offensive Leaders
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Jeff Trainor
59
▼6
Billy Philpott
80
▼26
Kevin Tobin
144
▼4
Defensive Leaders
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Jackson Suboch
50
▼19
Jake Dulac
117
▼13
Adam Towey
179
▲106
Faceoff Leaders
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Zack Hochman
12
▼4
Nolan Enneguess
839
▼80
Nat'l Rank refers to the player's ranking nationally within the offensive/defensive/faceoff category. Change indicates how that ranking has changed in the past week. Check out all the leaders here.
Win probability is an estimate based on the win percentage of every team that has been in a comparable time and score situation. We start with the basic time and score, then add or subtract win probability from each team depending on the recent sequence of plays and what that tells us about the likelihood that each team will score. Please, please, please do not treat this as a prediction. 90% win probability does not mean that the team has a 90% chance to win; it means that teams in the current situation have won 90% of the time. Win probabilities at the opening face-off are based on our current ELO ratings.

Either the game hasn't started yet or the streaming site is not sending data. Either way, we'll update this page once the stats start rolling in.
Team Pages
Utah
UMass