616
Lafayette Win Probability: 1.0%
Team Pages
Time Team Play LAF Win Prob.
Q4 0:01 Unforced Turnover 1.0%
Q4 0:01 Unforced Turnover 1.0%
Q4 0:37 Good Clear 1.1%
Q4 0:37 Good Clear 1.1%
Q4 0:48 Saved Shot 1.1%
Q4 0:48 Saved Shot 1.1%
Q4 1:02 Missed Shot 1.2%
Q4 1:02 Missed Shot 1.2%
Q4 1:34 Failed Clear 1.3%
Q4 1:34 Failed Clear 1.3%
Q4 1:49 Saved Shot 1.3%
Q4 1:49 Saved Shot 1.3%
Q4 2:25 Good Clear 1.4%
Q4 2:25 Good Clear 1.4%
Q4 2:32 Saved Shot 1.5%
Q4 2:32 Saved Shot 1.5%
Q4 3:04 Good Clear 1.6%
Q4 3:04 Good Clear 1.6%
Q4 3:20 Unforced Turnover 1.6%
Q4 3:20 Unforced Turnover 1.6%
Q4 4:31 Faceoff Win 1.8%
Q4 4:31 Faceoff Win 1.8%
LAF: 6RU: 16
LAF: 6RU: 16
Q4 4:31 Unassisted Goal 1.8%
Q4 4:31 Unassisted Goal 1.8%
Q4 5:03 Good Clear 1.9%
Q4 5:03 Good Clear 1.9%
Q4 5:23 Forced Turnover 2.0%
Q4 5:23 Forced Turnover 2.0%
Q4 5:32 Faceoff Win 2.0%
Q4 5:32 Faceoff Win 2.0%
LAF: 6RU: 15
LAF: 6RU: 15
Q4 5:32 Assisted Goal 2.0%
Q4 5:32 Assisted Goal 2.0%
Q4 6:17 Failed Clear 2.2%
Q4 6:17 Failed Clear 2.2%
Q4 6:31 Forced Turnover 2.2%
Q4 6:31 Forced Turnover 2.2%
Q4 7:10 Failed Clear 2.3%
Q4 7:10 Failed Clear 2.3%
Q4 7:15 Saved Shot 2.3%
Q4 7:15 Saved Shot 2.3%
Q4 7:48 Faceoff Win 2.4%
Q4 7:48 Faceoff Win 2.4%
LAF: 6RU: 14
LAF: 6RU: 14
Q4 7:48 Unassisted Goal 2.4%
Q4 7:48 Unassisted Goal 2.4%
Q4 7:59 Missed Shot 2.5%
Q4 7:59 Missed Shot 2.5%
Q4 8:29 Ground Ball 2.6%
Q4 8:29 Ground Ball 2.6%
Q4 8:30 Penalty - 1 min 2.6%
Q4 8:30 Penalty - 1 min 2.6%
Q4 8:30 Missed Shot 2.6%
Q4 8:30 Missed Shot 2.6%
Q4 8:44 Missed Shot 2.6%
Q4 8:44 Missed Shot 2.6%
Show All Plays

Summary Stats
RU
LAF
Goals
16
6
Possessions
43
36
Shots
50
11
Shots-on-Goal
32
8
Off. Efficiency
37.2%
16.7%
Assist Rate
44%
67%
Save Pct
25.0%
50.0%
Shooting Percentage
32.0%
54.5%
Shot-on-goal Rate
64.0%
72.7%
Faceoff Win Rate
48.0%
52.0%
Turnovers
9
25
Failed Clears
2
5
Groundballs
8
4
Time of Possession
55.1%
44.9%
Avg. Possession Length
42.8
41.7
Time to First Shot
34.1
26.9
Shots per Possession
1.16
0.31
Number of Contributors
21
17
By Quarter: Rutgers
 
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Goals
3
4
5
4
Possessions
11
11
9
12
Shots
14
9
11
16
Shots-on-Goal
8
7
8
9
Off. Efficiency
27%
36%
56%
33%
Save Pct
0%
50%
0%
100%
Shooting Percentage
21%
44%
45%
25%
Shot-on-goal Rate
57%
78%
73%
56%
Faceoff Win Rate
75%
33%
40%
60%
Groundball Win Rate
67%
50%
100%
67%
Turnover Rate
18%
27%
11%
25%
Time of Possession
59%
52%
42%
69%
Avg. Possession Length
48.7
36.8
41.7
43.8
Time to First Shot
34.1
41.0
34.5
28.4
Shots per Possession
1.27
0.82
1.22
1.33
Assist Rate
33%
0%
80%
50%
By Quarter: Lafayette
 
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Goals
1
1
4
0
Possessions
10
11
9
6
Shots
2
4
4
1
Shots-on-Goal
1
2
4
1
Off. Efficiency
10%
9%
44%
0%
Save Pct
62%
43%
38%
56%
Shooting Percentage
50%
25%
100%
0%
Shot-on-goal Rate
50%
50%
100%
100%
Faceoff Win Rate
25%
67%
60%
40%
Groundball Win Rate
33%
50%
0%
33%
Turnover Rate
70%
73%
56%
83%
Time of Possession
41%
48%
58%
31%
Avg. Possession Length
36.6
34.4
58.3
38.8
Time to First Shot
22.5
18.5
32.0
32.0
Shots per Possession
0.20
0.36
0.44
0.17
Assist Rate
100%
100%
50%
0%
Summary Stats
RU
LAF
Goals
16
6
Poss.
43
36
Shots
50
11
Shots-on-Goal
32
8
Off. Eff%
37.2%
16.7%
Assist %
44%
67%
Save Pct
25.0%
50.0%
Shooting %
32.0%
54.5%
SOG %
64.0%
72.7%
FO Win %
48.0%
52.0%
Turnovers
9
25
Failed Clears
2
5
Groundballs
8
4
T.O.P.
55.1%
44.9%
Avg Poss Length
42.8
41.7
Time to 1st Shot
34.1
26.9
Shots / Poss
1.16
0.31
# of Contributors
21
17
By Quarter: Rutgers
 
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Goals
3
4
5
4
Poss.
11
11
9
12
Shots
14
9
11
16
SOG
8
7
8
9
Off. Eff%
27%
36%
56%
33%
Save Pct
0%
50%
0%
100%
Shooting %
21%
44%
45%
25%
SOG %
57%
78%
73%
56%
FO Win %
75%
33%
40%
60%
GB Win %
67%
50%
100%
67%
Turnover %
18%
27%
11%
25%
T.O.P.
59%
52%
42%
69%
Poss Len.
48.7
36.8
41.7
43.8
Time to 1st
34.1
41.0
34.5
28.4
Shots / Poss
1.27
0.82
1.22
1.33
Assist %
33%
0%
80%
50%
By Quarter: Lafayette
 
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Goals
1
1
4
0
Poss.
10
11
9
6
Shots
2
4
4
1
SOG
1
2
4
1
Off. Eff%
10%
9%
44%
0%
Save Pct
62%
43%
38%
56%
Shooting %
50%
25%
100%
0%
SOG %
50%
50%
100%
100%
FO Win %
25%
67%
60%
40%
GB Win %
33%
50%
0%
33%
Turnover %
70%
73%
56%
83%
T.O.P.
41%
48%
58%
31%
Poss Len.
36.6
34.4
58.3
38.8
Time to 1st
22.5
18.5
32.0
32.0
Shots / Poss
0.20
0.36
0.44
0.17
Assist %
100%
100%
50%
0%
Rutgers Lafayette
Player EGA Player EGA
Rutgers Lafayette
Player EGA Player EGA
David Sprock 4.22 James Turco 2.21
David Sprock 4.22 James Turco 2.21
Owen Mead 2.76 Nick Jessen 2.21
Owen Mead 2.76 Nick Jessen 2.21
Adam Charalambides 2.70 Ian Maccauley 1.07
Adam Charalambides 2.70 Ian Maccauley 1.07

[easy-tweet tweet="According to #LaxWP, @RUmlax currently has a 99.0% win probability against @LafayetteMLAX" user="laxreference" url="https://lacrossereference.com/game-win-probabilities/rutgers_lafayette_20200317/?utm_source=Social" template="light"]

LacrosseReference Preview: Rutgers vs Lafayette

Tale of the Tape

Stat Category
Rutgers
Lafayette
Strength of Record
50th
64th
Lax-ELO Ranking
34th
73rd
Adjusted Shooting %
29th
58th
Adjusted Efficiency
29th
73rd
Time of Possession
70th
35th
Roster Depth
51st
60th
Pace
66th
12th

Team Pages

Style Comparison

Rutgers Offense
vs.
Lafayette Defense
RU Off: on poss. lasting...
<30 sec.
30-59 sec.
60-80 sec.
Pct of Poss.
27.1%
44.8%
28.1%
Pct of Goals
34.4%
43.7%
21.9%
Efficiency
42.3%
32.6%
25.9%
Ranking
3rd
19th
53rd
LAF Def: on poss. lasting...
<30 sec.
30-59 sec.
60-80 sec.
Efficiency
26.3%
34.8%
34.8%
Ranking
31st
65th
49th
Rutgers Defense
vs.
Lafayette Offense
LAF Off: on poss. lasting...
<30 sec.
30-59 sec.
60-80 sec.
Pct of Poss.
31.2%
39.2%
29.6%
Pct of Goals
34.4%
43.7%
21.9%
Efficiency
18.6%
18.9%
12.5%
Ranking
70th
68th
74th
RU Def: on poss. lasting...
<30 sec.
30-59 sec.
60-80 sec.
Efficiency
39.2%
30.5%
23.4%
Ranking
65th
47th
12th

Quarter Breakdowns

Rutgers: Season Stat Splits by Quarter
 
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Offensive Efficiency
28.6%
35.6%
37.5%
37.0%
Scoring Margin
-2
+6
-1
-3
Shooting %
29%
31%
31%
33%
Turnover Rate
28.6%
27.1%
44.6%
41.3%
Shots-on-Goal %
55%
63%
54%
65%
Time-of-Possession
43%
45%
48%
35%
Faceoff Win Rate
44%
29%
33%
27%
Time/Possession
41.9s
41.9s
44.1s
40.4s
Time to First Shot
29.9s
25.1s
31.5s
23.6s
Shots per Possession
0.99
1.17
1.26
1.18
Defensive Efficiency
32.7%
25.0%
33.3%
31.7%
Save Pct
51.4%
54.5%
40.5%
50.0%
Lafayette: Season Stat Splits by Quarter
 
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Offensive Efficiency
11.5%
20.4%
25.5%
22.4%
Scoring Margin
-23
-13
-11
-8
Shooting %
18%
24%
37%
25%
Turnover Rate
53.8%
71.4%
60.8%
55.2%
Shots-on-Goal %
48%
56%
54%
56%
Time-of-Possession
46%
51%
52%
47%
Faceoff Win Rate
37%
42%
49%
49%
Time/Possession
51.3s
58.3s
55.4s
43.2s
Time to First Shot
40.3s
44.9s
46.0s
30.7s
Shots per Possession
0.66
0.85
0.66
0.89
Defensive Efficiency
38.7%
36.5%
35.8%
30.9%
Save Pct
37.0%
47.7%
35.1%
48.8%

EGA Leaders

Rutgers
Lafayette
Offensive Leaders
Offensive Leaders
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
David Sprock
64
1
Adam Charalambides
76
2
Kieran Mullins
113
3
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Andrew Robbins
333
18
Macklin Fitzpatrick
338
86
Cole Dutton
348
54
Defensive Leaders
Defensive Leaders
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Zach Masessa
75
23
Ethan Rall
174
74
Garrett Bullett
442
117
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Chris Adamo
310
98
Sean Rushton
320
49
Tommy McGee
390
178
Faceoff Leaders
Faceoff Leaders
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Palmer Lloyd
55
3
David Walker
253
42
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
James Turco
45
5
Gabe Smithline
192
9
Nat'l Rank refers to the player's ranking nationally within the offensive/defensive/faceoff category. Change indicates how that ranking has changed in the past week. Check out all the leaders here.

Trending Up or Down

Rutgers
Lafayette
Stat
Previous 3 games
Last 3 games
Previous 3 games
Last 3 games
Record
2 - 1
0 - 3
0 - 3
0 - 3
Save Pct
48%
49%
40%
45%
Offensive Efficiency
34%
35%
19%
20%
Shooting Pct
29%
34%
24%
27%
Defensive Efficiency
29%
33%
39%
31%
Face-off Win%
38%
28%
35%
47%
Turnover Rate
34%
36%
63%
56%
Time-of-Possession
46%
39%
47%
51%
Avg Possession Length
39.3s
42.2s
49.0s
51.4s

Rutgers vs Lafayette

Tale of the Tape

Stat
Rutgers
Lafayette
Strength of Rec.
50th
64th
Lax-ELO Rank
34th
73rd
Adj Shooting %
29th
58th
Adj Efficiency
29th
73rd
T.O.P.
70th
35th
Roster Depth
51st
60th
Pace
66th
12th

Team Pages

Quarter Breakdowns

Rutgers: Season Stat Splits by Quarter
 
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Off Eff %
28.6%
35.6%
37.5%
37.0%
Scoring Margin
-2
+6
-1
-3
Shooting %
29%
31%
31%
33%
Turnover %
28.6%
27.1%
44.6%
41.3%
SOG %
55%
63%
54%
65%
TOP %
43%
45%
48%
35%
FO Win %
44%
29%
33%
27%
Time/Poss
41.9s
41.9s
44.1s
40.4s
Time to 1st
29.9s
25.1s
31.5s
23.6s
Shots/Poss
0.99
1.17
1.26
1.18
Def. Eff %
32.7%
25.0%
33.3%
31.7%
Save %
51.4%
54.5%
40.5%
50.0%
Lafayette: Season Stat Splits by Quarter
 
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Off Eff %
11.5%
20.4%
25.5%
22.4%
Scoring Margin
-23
-13
-11
-8
Shooting %
18%
24%
37%
25%
Turnover %
53.8%
71.4%
60.8%
55.2%
SOG %
48%
56%
54%
56%
TOP %
46%
51%
52%
47%
FO Win %
37%
42%
49%
49%
Time/Poss
51.3s
58.3s
55.4s
43.2s
Time to 1st
40.3s
44.9s
46.0s
30.7s
Shots/Poss
0.66
0.85
0.66
0.89
Def. Eff %
38.7%
36.5%
35.8%
30.9%
Save %
37.0%
47.7%
35.1%
48.8%

EGA Leaders

Rutgers
Offensive Leaders
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
David Sprock
64
1
Adam Charalambides
76
2
Kieran Mullins
113
3
Defensive Leaders
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Zach Masessa
75
23
Ethan Rall
174
74
Garrett Bullett
442
117
Faceoff Leaders
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Palmer Lloyd
55
3
David Walker
253
42
Lafayette
Offensive Leaders
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Andrew Robbins
333
18
Macklin Fitzpatrick
338
86
Cole Dutton
348
54
Defensive Leaders
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Chris Adamo
310
98
Sean Rushton
320
49
Tommy McGee
390
178
Faceoff Leaders
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
James Turco
45
5
Gabe Smithline
192
9
Nat'l Rank refers to the player's ranking nationally within the offensive/defensive/faceoff category. Change indicates how that ranking has changed in the past week. Check out all the leaders here.
Win probability is an estimate based on the win percentage of every team that has been in a comparable time and score situation. We start with the basic time and score, then add or subtract win probability from each team depending on the recent sequence of plays and what that tells us about the likelihood that each team will score. Please, please, please do not treat this as a prediction. 90% win probability does not mean that the team has a 90% chance to win; it means that teams in the current situation have won 90% of the time. Win probabilities at the opening face-off are based on our current ELO ratings.

Either the game hasn't started yet or the streaming site is not sending data. Either way, we'll update this page once the stats start rolling in.

Team Pages