Full Game List

98
Hofstra Win Probability: 83.1%
HOF
Q4 0:02
Forced Turnover
Turnover by HOF Riley Forte (caused by Zach Masessa).
Time Team Play HOF Win Prob.
Q4 0:01 Forced Turnover 83.1%
Q4 0:01 Forced Turnover 83.1%
Q4 0:44 Good Clear 89.5%
Q4 0:44 Good Clear 89.5%
Q4 1:00 Saved Shot 78.6%
Q4 1:00 Saved Shot 78.6%
Q4 1:13 Missed Shot 72.0%
Q4 1:13 Missed Shot 72.0%
Q4 1:46 Good Clear 69.1%
Q4 1:46 Good Clear 69.1%
Q4 2:02 Unforced Turnover 84.8%
Q4 2:02 Unforced Turnover 84.8%
Q4 2:15 Good Clear 86.0%
Q4 2:15 Good Clear 86.0%
Q4 2:16 Unforced Turnover 84.2%
Q4 2:16 Unforced Turnover 84.2%
Q4 2:46 Good Clear 83.1%
Q4 2:46 Good Clear 83.1%
Q4 2:54 Missed Shot 84.9%
Q4 2:54 Missed Shot 84.9%
Q4 3:32 Good Clear 78.9%
Q4 3:32 Good Clear 78.9%
Q4 3:35 Forced Turnover 75.7%
Q4 3:35 Forced Turnover 75.7%
Q4 3:41 Faceoff Win 77.0%
Q4 3:41 Faceoff Win 77.0%
HOF: 9RU: 8
HOF: 9RU: 8
Q4 3:41 Unassisted Goal 79.8%
Q4 3:41 Unassisted Goal 79.8%
Q4 3:56 Missed Shot 62.2%
Q4 3:56 Missed Shot 62.2%
Q4 4:10 Missed Shot 60.6%
Q4 4:10 Missed Shot 60.6%
Q4 4:24 Missed Shot 55.6%
Q4 4:24 Missed Shot 55.6%
Q4 5:01 Good Clear 56.6%
Q4 5:01 Good Clear 56.6%
Q4 5:17 Ground Ball 56.9%
Q4 5:17 Ground Ball 56.9%
Q4 5:18 Saved Shot 55.2%
Q4 5:18 Saved Shot 55.2%
Q4 5:32 Missed Shot 54.8%
Q4 5:32 Missed Shot 54.8%
Q4 6:12 Good Clear 56.8%
Q4 6:12 Good Clear 56.8%
Q4 6:18 Unforced Turnover 53.2%
Q4 6:18 Unforced Turnover 53.2%
Q4 6:48 Good Clear 49.7%
Q4 6:48 Good Clear 49.7%
Q4 6:51 Saved Shot 53.6%
Q4 6:51 Saved Shot 53.6%
Q4 7:26 Good Clear 43.9%
Q4 7:26 Good Clear 43.9%
Q4 7:36 Missed Shot 40.9%
Q4 7:36 Missed Shot 40.9%
Q4 8:11 Good Clear 53.8%
Q4 8:11 Good Clear 53.8%
Q4 8:27 Forced Turnover 58.2%
Q4 8:27 Forced Turnover 58.2%
Show All Plays

Summary Stats
RU
HOF
Goals
8
9
Possessions
40
37
Shots
38
32
Shots-on-Goal
19
15
Off. Efficiency
20.0%
24.3%
Assist Rate
38%
56%
Save Pct
40.0%
57.9%
Shooting Percentage
21.1%
28.1%
Shot-on-goal Rate
50.0%
46.9%
Faceoff Win Rate
50.0%
50.0%
Turnovers
15
18
Failed Clears
2
5
Groundballs
9
8
Time of Possession
49.1%
50.9%
Avg. Possession Length
41.2
46.2
Time to First Shot
34.3
36.8
Shots per Possession
0.95
0.86
Number of Contributors
21
25
By Quarter: Rutgers
 
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Goals
1
3
2
2
Possessions
12
9
9
10
Shots
8
12
13
5
Shots-on-Goal
4
6
6
3
Off. Efficiency
8%
33%
22%
20%
Save Pct
25%
17%
100%
75%
Shooting Percentage
12%
25%
15%
40%
Shot-on-goal Rate
50%
50%
46%
60%
Faceoff Win Rate
40%
50%
33%
75%
Groundball Win Rate
62%
67%
33%
33%
Turnover Rate
42%
22%
22%
60%
Time of Possession
38%
56%
60%
44%
Avg. Possession Length
28.1
47.1
53.6
40.4
Time to First Shot
24.8
34.9
39.3
36.2
Shots per Possession
0.67
1.33
1.44
0.50
Assist Rate
0%
33%
50%
50%
By Quarter: Hofstra
 
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Goals
3
5
0
1
Possessions
13
8
8
8
Shots
8
10
1
13
Shots-on-Goal
4
6
1
4
Off. Efficiency
23%
62%
0%
12%
Save Pct
75%
50%
67%
33%
Shooting Percentage
38%
50%
0%
8%
Shot-on-goal Rate
50%
60%
100%
31%
Faceoff Win Rate
60%
50%
67%
25%
Groundball Win Rate
38%
33%
67%
67%
Turnover Rate
38%
25%
88%
50%
Time of Possession
62%
44%
40%
56%
Avg. Possession Length
43.0
40.9
40.0
63.0
Time to First Shot
37.5
40.8
0.0
38.8
Shots per Possession
0.62
1.25
0.12
1.62
Assist Rate
67%
60%
0%
0%
Summary Stats
RU
HOF
Goals
8
9
Poss.
40
37
Shots
38
32
Shots-on-Goal
19
15
Off. Eff%
20.0%
24.3%
Assist %
38%
56%
Save Pct
40.0%
57.9%
Shooting %
21.1%
28.1%
SOG %
50.0%
46.9%
FO Win %
50.0%
50.0%
Turnovers
15
18
Failed Clears
2
5
Groundballs
9
8
T.O.P.
49.1%
50.9%
Avg Poss Length
41.2
46.2
Time to 1st Shot
34.3
36.8
Shots / Poss
0.95
0.86
# of Contributors
21
25
By Quarter: Rutgers
 
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Goals
1
3
2
2
Poss.
12
9
9
10
Shots
8
12
13
5
SOG
4
6
6
3
Off. Eff%
8%
33%
22%
20%
Save Pct
25%
17%
100%
75%
Shooting %
12%
25%
15%
40%
SOG %
50%
50%
46%
60%
FO Win %
40%
50%
33%
75%
GB Win %
62%
67%
33%
33%
Turnover %
42%
22%
22%
60%
T.O.P.
38%
56%
60%
44%
Poss Len.
28.1
47.1
53.6
40.4
Time to 1st
24.8
34.9
39.3
36.2
Shots / Poss
0.67
1.33
1.44
0.50
Assist %
0%
33%
50%
50%
By Quarter: Hofstra
 
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Goals
3
5
0
1
Poss.
13
8
8
8
Shots
8
10
1
13
SOG
4
6
1
4
Off. Eff%
23%
62%
0%
12%
Save Pct
75%
50%
67%
33%
Shooting %
38%
50%
0%
8%
SOG %
50%
60%
100%
31%
FO Win %
60%
50%
67%
25%
GB Win %
38%
33%
67%
67%
Turnover %
38%
25%
88%
50%
T.O.P.
62%
44%
40%
56%
Poss Len.
43.0
40.9
40.0
63.0
Time to 1st
37.5
40.8
0.0
38.8
Shots / Poss
0.62
1.25
0.12
1.62
Assist %
67%
60%
0%
0%
Rutgers Hofstra
Player EGA Player EGA
Rutgers Hofstra
Player EGA Player EGA
Kieran Mullins 2.64 Ryan Tierney 4.02
Kieran Mullins 2.64 Ryan Tierney 4.02
Tommy Coyne 2.42 Sterlyn Ardrey 1.81
Tommy Coyne 2.42 Sterlyn Ardrey 1.81
David Sprock 2.40 Brian Herber 1.74
David Sprock 2.40 Brian Herber 1.74


According to #LaxWP, @HofstraMLAX currently has a 83.1% win probability against @RUmlax

Click to Tweet

LacrosseReference Preview: Rutgers vs Hofstra

Tale of the Tape

Stat Category
Rutgers
Hofstra
Strength of Record
50th
44th
Lax-ELO Ranking
34th
33rd
Adjusted Shooting %
29th
35th
Adjusted Efficiency
29th
30th
Time of Possession
70th
23rd
Roster Depth
51st
27th
Pace
66th
62nd

Team Pages

Style Comparison

Rutgers Offense
vs.
Hofstra Defense
RU Off: on poss. lasting...
<30 sec.
30-59 sec.
60-80 sec.
Pct of Poss.
27.1%
44.8%
28.1%
Pct of Goals
34.4%
43.7%
21.9%
Efficiency
42.3%
32.6%
25.9%
Ranking
3rd
19th
53rd
HOF Def: on poss. lasting...
<30 sec.
30-59 sec.
60-80 sec.
Efficiency
29.6%
23.6%
28.6%
Ranking
43rd
16th
28th
Rutgers Defense
vs.
Hofstra Offense
HOF Off: on poss. lasting...
<30 sec.
30-59 sec.
60-80 sec.
Pct of Poss.
23.0%
35.8%
41.1%
Pct of Goals
20.2%
35.7%
44.0%
Efficiency
26.2%
29.7%
31.9%
Ranking
48th
32nd
32nd
RU Def: on poss. lasting...
<30 sec.
30-59 sec.
60-80 sec.
Efficiency
39.2%
30.5%
23.4%
Ranking
65th
47th
12th

Quarter Breakdowns

Rutgers: Season Stat Splits by Quarter
 
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Offensive Efficiency
28.6%
35.6%
37.5%
37.0%
Scoring Margin
-2
+6
-1
-3
Shooting %
29%
31%
31%
33%
Turnover Rate
28.6%
27.1%
44.6%
41.3%
Shots-on-Goal %
55%
63%
54%
65%
Time-of-Possession
43%
45%
48%
35%
Faceoff Win Rate
44%
29%
33%
27%
Time/Possession
41.9s
41.9s
44.1s
40.4s
Time to First Shot
29.9s
25.1s
31.5s
23.6s
Shots per Possession
0.99
1.17
1.26
1.18
Defensive Efficiency
32.7%
25.0%
33.3%
31.7%
Save Pct
51.4%
54.5%
40.5%
50.0%
Hofstra: Season Stat Splits by Quarter
 
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Offensive Efficiency
31.2%
34.8%
33.3%
25.0%
Scoring Margin
+3
+6
+11
+4
Shooting %
29%
34%
30%
28%
Turnover Rate
29.9%
27.5%
29.3%
36.4%
Shots-on-Goal %
57%
64%
58%
59%
Time-of-Possession
50%
48%
54%
56%
Faceoff Win Rate
59%
56%
64%
70%
Time/Possession
40.4s
43.6s
45.4s
38.0s
Time to First Shot
28.2s
35.1s
33.2s
28.2s
Shots per Possession
1.08
1.01
1.16
0.91
Defensive Efficiency
31.3%
27.7%
25.0%
25.7%
Save Pct
34.4%
47.1%
58.8%
52.6%

EGA Leaders

Rutgers
Hofstra
Offensive Leaders
Offensive Leaders
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
David Sprock
64
▼1
Adam Charalambides
76
▼2
Kieran Mullins
113
▲3
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Ryan Tierney
7
▬
Whit Stopak
206
▲103
Justin Sykes
222
▲28
Defensive Leaders
Defensive Leaders
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Zach Masessa
75
▲23
Ethan Rall
174
▲74
Garrett Bullett
442
▼117
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Eric Wenz
13
▲16
Michael Altmann
175
▲24
Daniel Ochs
259
▼58
Faceoff Leaders
Faceoff Leaders
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Palmer Lloyd
55
▲3
David Walker
253
▼42
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Brian Herber
2
▲4
Chase Patterson
190
▲19
Nat'l Rank refers to the player's ranking nationally within the offensive/defensive/faceoff category. Change indicates how that ranking has changed in the past week. Check out all the leaders here.

Trending Up or Down

Rutgers
Hofstra
Stat
Previous 3 games
Last 3 games
Previous 3 games
Last 3 games
Record
2 - 1
0 - 3
1 - 2
2 - 1
Save Pct
48%
49%
49%
50%
Offensive Efficiency
34%
35%
25%
31%
Shooting Pct
29%
34%
23%
32%
Defensive Efficiency
29%
33%
29%
23%
Face-off Win%
38%
28%
47%
68%
Turnover Rate
34%
36%
32%
29%
Time-of-Possession
46%
39%
48%
56%
Avg Possession Length
39.3s
42.2s
40.6s
41.8s

Rutgers vs Hofstra

Tale of the Tape

Stat
Rutgers
Hofstra
Strength of Rec.
50th
44th
Lax-ELO Rank
34th
33rd
Adj Shooting %
29th
35th
Adj Efficiency
29th
30th
T.O.P.
70th
23rd
Roster Depth
51st
27th
Pace
66th
62nd

Team Pages

Quarter Breakdowns

Rutgers: Season Stat Splits by Quarter
 
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Off Eff %
28.6%
35.6%
37.5%
37.0%
Scoring Margin
-2
+6
-1
-3
Shooting %
29%
31%
31%
33%
Turnover %
28.6%
27.1%
44.6%
41.3%
SOG %
55%
63%
54%
65%
TOP %
43%
45%
48%
35%
FO Win %
44%
29%
33%
27%
Time/Poss
41.9s
41.9s
44.1s
40.4s
Time to 1st
29.9s
25.1s
31.5s
23.6s
Shots/Poss
0.99
1.17
1.26
1.18
Def. Eff %
32.7%
25.0%
33.3%
31.7%
Save %
51.4%
54.5%
40.5%
50.0%
Hofstra: Season Stat Splits by Quarter
 
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Off Eff %
31.2%
34.8%
33.3%
25.0%
Scoring Margin
+3
+6
+11
+4
Shooting %
29%
34%
30%
28%
Turnover %
29.9%
27.5%
29.3%
36.4%
SOG %
57%
64%
58%
59%
TOP %
50%
48%
54%
56%
FO Win %
59%
56%
64%
70%
Time/Poss
40.4s
43.6s
45.4s
38.0s
Time to 1st
28.2s
35.1s
33.2s
28.2s
Shots/Poss
1.08
1.01
1.16
0.91
Def. Eff %
31.3%
27.7%
25.0%
25.7%
Save %
34.4%
47.1%
58.8%
52.6%

EGA Leaders

Rutgers
Offensive Leaders
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
David Sprock
64
▼1
Adam Charalambides
76
▼2
Kieran Mullins
113
▲3
Defensive Leaders
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Zach Masessa
75
▲23
Ethan Rall
174
▲74
Garrett Bullett
442
▼117
Faceoff Leaders
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Palmer Lloyd
55
▲3
David Walker
253
▼42
Hofstra
Offensive Leaders
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Ryan Tierney
7
▬
Whit Stopak
206
▲103
Justin Sykes
222
▲28
Defensive Leaders
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Eric Wenz
13
▲16
Michael Altmann
175
▲24
Daniel Ochs
259
▼58
Faceoff Leaders
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Brian Herber
2
▲4
Chase Patterson
190
▲19
Nat'l Rank refers to the player's ranking nationally within the offensive/defensive/faceoff category. Change indicates how that ranking has changed in the past week. Check out all the leaders here.
Win probability is an estimate based on the win percentage of every team that has been in a comparable time and score situation. We start with the basic time and score, then add or subtract win probability from each team depending on the recent sequence of plays and what that tells us about the likelihood that each team will score. Please, please, please do not treat this as a prediction. 90% win probability does not mean that the team has a 90% chance to win; it means that teams in the current situation have won 90% of the time. Win probabilities at the opening face-off are based on our current ELO ratings.

Either the game hasn't started yet or the streaming site is not sending data. Either way, we'll update this page once the stats start rolling in.
Team Pages
Rutgers
Hofstra