1611
Quinnipiac Win Probability: 99.0%
Team Pages
Time Team Play QUI Win Prob.
Q4 0:01 Penalty - 1 min 99.0%
Q4 0:01 Penalty - 1 min 99.0%
Q4 0:01 Saved Shot 99.0%
Q4 0:01 Saved Shot 99.0%
Q4 0:02 Good Clear 99.0%
Q4 0:02 Good Clear 99.0%
Q4 0:13 Unforced Turnover 98.9%
Q4 0:13 Unforced Turnover 98.9%
Q4 1:07 Unforced Turnover 98.6%
Q4 1:07 Unforced Turnover 98.6%
Q4 1:14 Ground Ball 98.5%
Q4 1:14 Ground Ball 98.5%
Q4 1:22 Good Clear 98.5%
Q4 1:22 Good Clear 98.5%
Q4 1:26 Unforced Turnover 98.5%
Q4 1:26 Unforced Turnover 98.5%
Q4 2:12 Faceoff Win 98.2%
Q4 2:12 Faceoff Win 98.2%
QUI: 16MAR: 11
QUI: 16MAR: 11
Q4 2:12 Unassisted Goal 98.2%
Q4 2:12 Unassisted Goal 98.2%
Q4 2:22 Missed Shot 98.1%
Q4 2:22 Missed Shot 98.1%
Q4 2:32 Missed Shot 98.1%
Q4 2:32 Missed Shot 98.1%
Q4 3:05 Penalty - 1 min 97.9%
Q4 3:05 Penalty - 1 min 97.9%
QUI: 15MAR: 11
QUI: 15MAR: 11
Q4 3:05 Unassisted Goal 97.9%
Q4 3:05 Unassisted Goal 97.9%
Q4 3:31 Good Clear 95.4%
Q4 3:31 Good Clear 95.4%
Q4 3:37 Saved Shot 95.0%
Q4 3:37 Saved Shot 95.0%
Q4 3:47 Missed Shot 94.6%
Q4 3:47 Missed Shot 94.6%
Q4 3:58 Missed Shot 95.0%
Q4 3:58 Missed Shot 95.0%
Q4 4:32 Faceoff Win 94.3%
Q4 4:32 Faceoff Win 94.3%
QUI: 14MAR: 11
QUI: 14MAR: 11
Q4 4:32 Assisted Goal 96.3%
Q4 4:32 Assisted Goal 96.3%
Q4 4:57 Faceoff Win 83.4%
Q4 4:57 Faceoff Win 83.4%
QUI: 13MAR: 11
QUI: 13MAR: 11
Q4 4:57 Assisted Goal 81.0%
Q4 4:57 Assisted Goal 81.0%
Q4 5:20 Penalty - 1 min 70.0%
Q4 5:20 Penalty - 1 min 70.0%
Q4 5:20 Saved Shot 63.3%
Q4 5:20 Saved Shot 63.3%
Q4 5:43 Faceoff Win 64.7%
Q4 5:43 Faceoff Win 64.7%
QUI: 12MAR: 11
QUI: 12MAR: 11
Show All Plays

Summary Stats
MAR
QUI
Goals
11
16
Possessions
46
47
Shots
35
40
Shots-on-Goal
22
22
Off. Efficiency
23.9%
34.0%
Assist Rate
55%
31%
Save Pct
27.3%
50.0%
Shooting Percentage
31.4%
40.0%
Shot-on-goal Rate
62.9%
55.0%
Faceoff Win Rate
44.4%
55.6%
Turnovers
18
22
Failed Clears
3
6
Groundballs
6
7
Time of Possession
51.3%
48.7%
Avg. Possession Length
36.3
33.7
Time to First Shot
26.9
25.9
Shots per Possession
0.76
0.85
Number of Contributors
22
19
By Quarter: Marist
 
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Goals
3
3
2
3
Possessions
12
12
10
12
Shots
11
6
8
10
Shots-on-Goal
6
5
4
7
Off. Efficiency
25%
25%
20%
25%
Save Pct
67%
0%
25%
12%
Shooting Percentage
27%
50%
25%
30%
Shot-on-goal Rate
55%
83%
50%
70%
Faceoff Win Rate
50%
50%
40%
38%
Groundball Win Rate
67%
67%
0%
33%
Turnover Rate
42%
50%
40%
25%
Time of Possession
63%
53%
49%
40%
Avg. Possession Length
39.6
38.1
41.2
27.0
Time to First Shot
19.7
33.0
35.3
21.7
Shots per Possession
0.92
0.50
0.80
0.83
Assist Rate
33%
67%
50%
67%
By Quarter: Quinnipiac
 
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Goals
2
4
3
7
Possessions
8
12
11
16
Shots
9
8
6
17
Shots-on-Goal
6
4
4
8
Off. Efficiency
25%
33%
27%
44%
Save Pct
50%
40%
50%
57%
Shooting Percentage
22%
50%
50%
41%
Shot-on-goal Rate
67%
50%
67%
47%
Faceoff Win Rate
50%
50%
60%
62%
Groundball Win Rate
33%
33%
100%
67%
Turnover Rate
12%
58%
64%
44%
Time of Possession
37%
47%
51%
60%
Avg. Possession Length
34.8
33.7
38.5
29.9
Time to First Shot
25.6
25.8
21.8
28.2
Shots per Possession
1.12
0.67
0.55
1.06
Assist Rate
0%
0%
67%
43%
Summary Stats
MAR
QUI
Goals
11
16
Poss.
46
47
Shots
35
40
Shots-on-Goal
22
22
Off. Eff%
23.9%
34.0%
Assist %
55%
31%
Save Pct
27.3%
50.0%
Shooting %
31.4%
40.0%
SOG %
62.9%
55.0%
FO Win %
44.4%
55.6%
Turnovers
18
22
Failed Clears
3
6
Groundballs
6
7
T.O.P.
51.3%
48.7%
Avg Poss Length
36.3
33.7
Time to 1st Shot
26.9
25.9
Shots / Poss
0.76
0.85
# of Contributors
22
19
By Quarter: Marist
 
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Goals
3
3
2
3
Poss.
12
12
10
12
Shots
11
6
8
10
SOG
6
5
4
7
Off. Eff%
25%
25%
20%
25%
Save Pct
67%
0%
25%
12%
Shooting %
27%
50%
25%
30%
SOG %
55%
83%
50%
70%
FO Win %
50%
50%
40%
38%
GB Win %
67%
67%
0%
33%
Turnover %
42%
50%
40%
25%
T.O.P.
63%
53%
49%
40%
Poss Len.
39.6
38.1
41.2
27.0
Time to 1st
19.7
33.0
35.3
21.7
Shots / Poss
0.92
0.50
0.80
0.83
Assist %
33%
67%
50%
67%
By Quarter: Quinnipiac
 
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Goals
2
4
3
7
Poss.
8
12
11
16
Shots
9
8
6
17
SOG
6
4
4
8
Off. Eff%
25%
33%
27%
44%
Save Pct
50%
40%
50%
57%
Shooting %
22%
50%
50%
41%
SOG %
67%
50%
67%
47%
FO Win %
50%
50%
60%
62%
GB Win %
33%
33%
100%
67%
Turnover %
12%
58%
64%
44%
T.O.P.
37%
47%
51%
60%
Poss Len.
34.8
33.7
38.5
29.9
Time to 1st
25.6
25.8
21.8
28.2
Shots / Poss
1.12
0.67
0.55
1.06
Assist %
0%
0%
67%
43%
Marist Quinnipiac
Player EGA Player EGA
Marist Quinnipiac
Player EGA Player EGA
Jason Intermesoli 2.70 Will Abbott 5.55
Jason Intermesoli 2.70 Will Abbott 5.55
Jake Weinman 2.64 John Delucia 4.08
Jake Weinman 2.64 John Delucia 4.08
Jamison Embury 1.92 Jake Tellers 3.03
Jamison Embury 1.92 Jake Tellers 3.03


According to #LaxWP, @QU_MLAX currently has a 99.0% win probability against @Marist_MensLax

Click to Tweet

LacrosseReference Preview: Quinnipiac vs Marist

Tale of the Tape

Stat Category
Quinnipiac
Marist
Strength of Record
74th
40th
Lax-ELO Ranking
56th
36th
Adjusted Shooting %
69th
21st
Adjusted Efficiency
70th
31st
Time of Possession
52nd
33rd
Roster Depth
53rd
28th
Pace
3rd
36th

Team Pages

Style Comparison

Quinnipiac Offense
vs.
Marist Defense
QUI Off: on poss. lasting...
<30 sec.
30-59 sec.
60-80 sec.
Pct of Poss.
19.8%
37.3%
42.9%
Pct of Goals
25.0%
29.5%
45.5%
Efficiency
26.2%
16.5%
22.0%
Ranking
47th
71st
65th
MAR Def: on poss. lasting...
<30 sec.
30-59 sec.
60-80 sec.
Efficiency
26.2%
33.3%
30.0%
Ranking
30th
59th
35th
Quinnipiac Defense
vs.
Marist Offense
MAR Off: on poss. lasting...
<30 sec.
30-59 sec.
60-80 sec.
Pct of Poss.
22.7%
33.6%
43.7%
Pct of Goals
24.7%
39.7%
35.6%
Efficiency
34.6%
37.7%
26.0%
Ranking
18th
9th
52nd
QUI Def: on poss. lasting...
<30 sec.
30-59 sec.
60-80 sec.
Efficiency
42.0%
27.7%
37.9%
Ranking
70th
33rd
63rd

Quarter Breakdowns

Quinnipiac: Season Stat Splits by Quarter
 
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Offensive Efficiency
28.4%
19.7%
21.7%
18.0%
Scoring Margin
-7
-7
-11
-8
Shooting %
37%
20%
23%
16%
Turnover Rate
41.8%
51.5%
36.7%
42.6%
Shots-on-Goal %
69%
45%
60%
51%
Time-of-Possession
49%
51%
46%
49%
Faceoff Win Rate
66%
58%
63%
47%
Time/Possession
38.4s
38.6s
44.1s
41.1s
Time to First Shot
36.6s
26.1s
28.2s
26.4s
Shots per Possession
0.76
0.99
1.07
1.16
Defensive Efficiency
43.3%
28.6%
39.3%
30.2%
Save Pct
36.6%
56.5%
47.8%
47.2%
Marist: Season Stat Splits by Quarter
 
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Offensive Efficiency
33.3%
26.4%
36.2%
32.4%
Scoring Margin
+2
-1
+6
+5
Shooting %
38%
26%
32%
33%
Turnover Rate
28.6%
37.7%
46.6%
40.8%
Shots-on-Goal %
71%
64%
55%
70%
Time-of-Possession
40%
49%
56%
56%
Faceoff Win Rate
59%
62%
64%
68%
Time/Possession
34.2s
48.2s
52.7s
41.8s
Time to First Shot
35.7s
41.5s
37.6s
29.8s
Shots per Possession
0.88
1.00
1.15
0.99
Defensive Efficiency
32.2%
28.8%
28.8%
28.6%
Save Pct
44.1%
46.4%
58.3%
50.0%

EGA Leaders

Quinnipiac
Marist
Offensive Leaders
Offensive Leaders
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Jake Tomsik
94
24
Will Abbott
139
31
Jake Tellers
177
7
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Jojo Pirreca
70
15
Jamison Embury
107
3
Joe Tierney
167
23
Defensive Leaders
Defensive Leaders
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Matt DI Lella
73
23
Boyd Hall
474
105
CJ Gallagher
474
71
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Kyle Stofko
33
5
JT Roselle
55
44
Sam Ahlgrim
280
28
Faceoff Leaders
Faceoff Leaders
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Dimitri George
13
11
Ryan Kaye
174
610
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Peyton Smith
11
1
Andrew Evans
151
18
Nat'l Rank refers to the player's ranking nationally within the offensive/defensive/faceoff category. Change indicates how that ranking has changed in the past week. Check out all the leaders here.

Trending Up or Down

Quinnipiac
Marist
Stat
Previous 3 games
Last 3 games
Previous 3 games
Last 3 games
Record
0 - 3
0 - 3
2 - 1
1 - 2
Save Pct
53%
41%
55%
46%
Offensive Efficiency
21%
23%
33%
32%
Shooting Pct
24%
23%
34%
30%
Defensive Efficiency
31%
39%
24%
35%
Face-off Win%
52%
68%
64%
61%
Turnover Rate
50%
37%
40%
37%
Time-of-Possession
46%
51%
54%
46%
Avg Possession Length
37.7s
40.3s
46.5s
39.5s

Quinnipiac vs Marist

Tale of the Tape

Stat
Quinnipiac
Marist
Strength of Rec.
74th
40th
Lax-ELO Rank
56th
36th
Adj Shooting %
69th
21st
Adj Efficiency
70th
31st
T.O.P.
52nd
33rd
Roster Depth
53rd
28th
Pace
3rd
36th

Team Pages

Quarter Breakdowns

Quinnipiac: Season Stat Splits by Quarter
 
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Off Eff %
28.4%
19.7%
21.7%
18.0%
Scoring Margin
-7
-7
-11
-8
Shooting %
37%
20%
23%
16%
Turnover %
41.8%
51.5%
36.7%
42.6%
SOG %
69%
45%
60%
51%
TOP %
49%
51%
46%
49%
FO Win %
66%
58%
63%
47%
Time/Poss
38.4s
38.6s
44.1s
41.1s
Time to 1st
36.6s
26.1s
28.2s
26.4s
Shots/Poss
0.76
0.99
1.07
1.16
Def. Eff %
43.3%
28.6%
39.3%
30.2%
Save %
36.6%
56.5%
47.8%
47.2%
Marist: Season Stat Splits by Quarter
 
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Off Eff %
33.3%
26.4%
36.2%
32.4%
Scoring Margin
+2
-1
+6
+5
Shooting %
38%
26%
32%
33%
Turnover %
28.6%
37.7%
46.6%
40.8%
SOG %
71%
64%
55%
70%
TOP %
40%
49%
56%
56%
FO Win %
59%
62%
64%
68%
Time/Poss
34.2s
48.2s
52.7s
41.8s
Time to 1st
35.7s
41.5s
37.6s
29.8s
Shots/Poss
0.88
1.00
1.15
0.99
Def. Eff %
32.2%
28.8%
28.8%
28.6%
Save %
44.1%
46.4%
58.3%
50.0%

EGA Leaders

Quinnipiac
Offensive Leaders
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Jake Tomsik
94
24
Will Abbott
139
31
Jake Tellers
177
7
Defensive Leaders
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Matt DI Lella
73
23
Boyd Hall
474
105
CJ Gallagher
474
71
Faceoff Leaders
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Dimitri George
13
11
Ryan Kaye
174
610
Marist
Offensive Leaders
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Jojo Pirreca
70
15
Jamison Embury
107
3
Joe Tierney
167
23
Defensive Leaders
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Kyle Stofko
33
5
JT Roselle
55
44
Sam Ahlgrim
280
28
Faceoff Leaders
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Peyton Smith
11
1
Andrew Evans
151
18
Nat'l Rank refers to the player's ranking nationally within the offensive/defensive/faceoff category. Change indicates how that ranking has changed in the past week. Check out all the leaders here.
Win probability is an estimate based on the win percentage of every team that has been in a comparable time and score situation. We start with the basic time and score, then add or subtract win probability from each team depending on the recent sequence of plays and what that tells us about the likelihood that each team will score. Please, please, please do not treat this as a prediction. 90% win probability does not mean that the team has a 90% chance to win; it means that teams in the current situation have won 90% of the time. Win probabilities at the opening face-off are based on our current ELO ratings.

Either the game hasn't started yet or the streaming site is not sending data. Either way, we'll update this page once the stats start rolling in.

Team Pages