137
Harvard Win Probability: 99.0%
Team Pages
Time Team Play HARV Win Prob.
HARV: 13BU: 7
HARV: 13BU: 7
Q4 0:01 Unassisted Goal 99.0%
Q4 0:01 Unassisted Goal 99.0%
Q4 0:20 Ground Ball 98.9%
Q4 0:20 Ground Ball 98.9%
Q4 0:21 Missed Shot 98.9%
Q4 0:21 Missed Shot 98.9%
Q4 0:55 Good Clear 98.7%
Q4 0:55 Good Clear 98.7%
Q4 1:12 Forced Turnover 98.5%
Q4 1:12 Forced Turnover 98.5%
Q4 2:10 Faceoff Win 98.2%
Q4 2:10 Faceoff Win 98.2%
HARV: 12BU: 7
HARV: 12BU: 7
Q4 2:10 Assisted Goal 98.2%
Q4 2:10 Assisted Goal 98.2%
Q4 2:42 Good Clear 98.0%
Q4 2:42 Good Clear 98.0%
Q4 2:45 Unforced Turnover 97.9%
Q4 2:45 Unforced Turnover 97.9%
Q4 3:22 Failed Clear 97.6%
Q4 3:22 Failed Clear 97.6%
Q4 3:30 Forced Turnover 97.7%
Q4 3:30 Forced Turnover 97.7%
Q4 4:43 Good Clear 96.9%
Q4 4:43 Good Clear 96.9%
Q4 4:49 Unforced Turnover 97.0%
Q4 4:49 Unforced Turnover 97.0%
Q4 5:17 Good Clear 97.0%
Q4 5:17 Good Clear 97.0%
Q4 5:25 Forced Turnover 96.9%
Q4 5:25 Forced Turnover 96.9%
Q4 6:14 Good Clear 94.7%
Q4 6:14 Good Clear 94.7%
Q4 6:27 Unforced Turnover 95.7%
Q4 6:27 Unforced Turnover 95.7%
Q4 7:33 Good Clear 96.1%
Q4 7:33 Good Clear 96.1%
Q4 7:45 Unforced Turnover 96.0%
Q4 7:45 Unforced Turnover 96.0%
Q4 8:10 Faceoff Win 95.8%
Q4 8:10 Faceoff Win 95.8%
HARV: 11BU: 7
HARV: 11BU: 7
Q4 8:10 Assisted Goal 95.8%
Q4 8:10 Assisted Goal 95.8%
Q4 8:22 Missed Shot 95.7%
Q4 8:22 Missed Shot 95.7%
Q4 8:32 Missed Shot 95.3%
Q4 8:32 Missed Shot 95.3%
Q4 8:42 Missed Shot 94.9%
Q4 8:42 Missed Shot 94.9%
Q4 9:11 Good Clear 90.1%
Q4 9:11 Good Clear 90.1%
Q4 9:12 Forced Turnover 87.4%
Q4 9:12 Forced Turnover 87.4%
Q4 10:06 Good Clear 86.4%
Q4 10:06 Good Clear 86.4%
Show All Plays

Summary Stats
BU
HARV
Goals
7
13
Possessions
48
46
Shots
32
29
Shots-on-Goal
17
23
Off. Efficiency
14.6%
28.3%
Assist Rate
86%
62%
Save Pct
43.5%
58.8%
Shooting Percentage
21.9%
44.8%
Shot-on-goal Rate
53.1%
79.3%
Faceoff Win Rate
57.1%
42.9%
Turnovers
26
18
Failed Clears
1
5
Groundballs
8
9
Time of Possession
52.2%
47.8%
Avg. Possession Length
35.5
33.9
Time to First Shot
22.6
32.1
Shots per Possession
0.67
0.63
Number of Contributors
22
18
By Quarter: Boston U
 
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Goals
3
0
4
0
Possessions
14
10
16
8
Shots
10
6
15
1
Shots-on-Goal
7
3
7
0
Off. Efficiency
21%
0%
25%
0%
Save Pct
83%
0%
67%
14%
Shooting Percentage
30%
0%
27%
0%
Shot-on-goal Rate
70%
50%
47%
0%
Faceoff Win Rate
60%
60%
67%
40%
Groundball Win Rate
50%
25%
60%
50%
Turnover Rate
36%
70%
38%
100%
Time of Possession
52%
52%
61%
45%
Avg. Possession Length
30.4
41.3
29.9
48.2
Time to First Shot
21.1
28.5
22.0
26.0
Shots per Possession
0.71
0.60
0.94
0.12
Assist Rate
100%
0%
75%
0%
By Quarter: Harvard
 
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Goals
1
4
2
6
Possessions
12
12
11
11
Shots
7
4
6
12
Shots-on-Goal
6
4
6
7
Off. Efficiency
8%
33%
18%
55%
Save Pct
57%
100%
43%
0%
Shooting Percentage
14%
100%
33%
50%
Shot-on-goal Rate
86%
100%
100%
58%
Faceoff Win Rate
40%
40%
33%
60%
Groundball Win Rate
50%
75%
40%
50%
Turnover Rate
42%
50%
27%
36%
Time of Possession
48%
48%
39%
55%
Avg. Possession Length
32.8
31.8
28.4
43.1
Time to First Shot
36.4
23.5
33.3
32.9
Shots per Possession
0.58
0.33
0.55
1.09
Assist Rate
100%
50%
0%
83%
Summary Stats
BU
HARV
Goals
7
13
Poss.
48
46
Shots
32
29
Shots-on-Goal
17
23
Off. Eff%
14.6%
28.3%
Assist %
86%
62%
Save Pct
43.5%
58.8%
Shooting %
21.9%
44.8%
SOG %
53.1%
79.3%
FO Win %
57.1%
42.9%
Turnovers
26
18
Failed Clears
1
5
Groundballs
8
9
T.O.P.
52.2%
47.8%
Avg Poss Length
35.5
33.9
Time to 1st Shot
22.6
32.1
Shots / Poss
0.67
0.63
# of Contributors
22
18
By Quarter: Boston U
 
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Goals
3
0
4
0
Poss.
14
10
16
8
Shots
10
6
15
1
SOG
7
3
7
0
Off. Eff%
21%
0%
25%
0%
Save Pct
83%
0%
67%
14%
Shooting %
30%
0%
27%
0%
SOG %
70%
50%
47%
0%
FO Win %
60%
60%
67%
40%
GB Win %
50%
25%
60%
50%
Turnover %
36%
70%
38%
100%
T.O.P.
52%
52%
61%
45%
Poss Len.
30.4
41.3
29.9
48.2
Time to 1st
21.1
28.5
22.0
26.0
Shots / Poss
0.71
0.60
0.94
0.12
Assist %
100%
0%
75%
0%
By Quarter: Harvard
 
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Goals
1
4
2
6
Poss.
12
12
11
11
Shots
7
4
6
12
SOG
6
4
6
7
Off. Eff%
8%
33%
18%
55%
Save Pct
57%
100%
43%
0%
Shooting %
14%
100%
33%
50%
SOG %
86%
100%
100%
58%
FO Win %
40%
40%
33%
60%
GB Win %
50%
75%
40%
50%
Turnover %
42%
50%
27%
36%
T.O.P.
48%
48%
39%
55%
Poss Len.
32.8
31.8
28.4
43.1
Time to 1st
36.4
23.5
33.3
32.9
Shots / Poss
0.58
0.33
0.55
1.09
Assist %
100%
50%
0%
83%
Boston U Harvard
Player EGA Player EGA
Boston U Harvard
Player EGA Player EGA
Jake Cates 2.52 Kyle Anderson 4.82
Jake Cates 2.52 Kyle Anderson 4.82
Sean Christman 2.22 Nick Loring 2.50
Sean Christman 2.22 Nick Loring 2.50
Vince Dalto 1.77 Austin Madronic 1.91
Vince Dalto 1.77 Austin Madronic 1.91


According to #LaxWP, @HarvardLacrosse currently has a 99.0% win probability against @TerrierMLAX

Click to Tweet

LacrosseReference Preview: Boston U vs Harvard

Tale of the Tape

Stat Category
Boston U
Harvard
Strength of Record
46th
36th
Lax-ELO Ranking
27th
48th
Adjusted Shooting %
51st
9th
Adjusted Efficiency
49th
21st
Time of Possession
38th
43rd
Roster Depth
13th
59th
Pace
2nd
27th

Team Pages

Style Comparison

Boston U Offense
vs.
Harvard Defense
BU Off: on poss. lasting...
<30 sec.
30-59 sec.
60-80 sec.
Pct of Poss.
17.4%
47.8%
34.8%
Pct of Goals
15.6%
44.4%
40.0%
Efficiency
19.4%
20.2%
25.0%
Ranking
67th
67th
54th
HARV Def: on poss. lasting...
<30 sec.
30-59 sec.
60-80 sec.
Efficiency
23.1%
32.1%
30.8%
Ranking
13th
55th
39th
Boston U Defense
vs.
Harvard Offense
HARV Off: on poss. lasting...
<30 sec.
30-59 sec.
60-80 sec.
Pct of Poss.
25.8%
39.5%
34.7%
Pct of Goals
20.5%
36.4%
43.2%
Efficiency
28.1%
32.7%
44.2%
Ranking
39th
18th
2nd
BU Def: on poss. lasting...
<30 sec.
30-59 sec.
60-80 sec.
Efficiency
29.5%
19.2%
24.4%
Ranking
42nd
8th
14th

Quarter Breakdowns

Boston U: Season Stat Splits by Quarter
 
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Offensive Efficiency
24.6%
23.4%
16.9%
25.0%
Scoring Margin
+1
-1
-7
+3
Shooting %
30%
32%
19%
31%
Turnover Rate
47.7%
46.8%
44.6%
41.2%
Shots-on-Goal %
48%
71%
56%
60%
Time-of-Possession
57%
56%
55%
50%
Faceoff Win Rate
57%
63%
58%
71%
Time/Possession
46.0s
32.3s
40.9s
35.2s
Time to First Shot
27.3s
30.3s
29.8s
31.1s
Shots per Possession
0.83
0.73
0.90
0.84
Defensive Efficiency
23.4%
27.1%
27.7%
22.6%
Save Pct
55.9%
45.7%
51.4%
58.8%
Harvard: Season Stat Splits by Quarter
 
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Offensive Efficiency
38.2%
41.9%
26.5%
30.0%
Scoring Margin
+5
EVEN
EVEN
-3
Shooting %
41%
38%
28%
35%
Turnover Rate
50.0%
41.9%
52.9%
35.0%
Shots-on-Goal %
59%
68%
59%
74%
Time-of-Possession
52%
46%
53%
51%
Faceoff Win Rate
38%
28%
42%
53%
Time/Possession
51.3s
56.6s
56.5s
42.2s
Time to First Shot
36.6s
41.0s
46.8s
38.2s
Shots per Possession
0.95
1.11
0.93
0.88
Defensive Efficiency
22.9%
30.2%
23.7%
37.5%
Save Pct
72.4%
48.0%
64.0%
40.0%

EGA Leaders

Boston U
Harvard
Offensive Leaders
Offensive Leaders
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Vince DAlto
110
59
Louis Perfetto
184
64
Jake Cates
225
84
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Austin Madronic
243
58
Kyle Anderson
309
51
Nick Loring
368
124
Defensive Leaders
Defensive Leaders
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Chase Levesque
18
9
Reece Eddy
19
9
Collin Loughead
65
29
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Beau Botkiss
205
45
Frankie Tangredi
229
17
David Strupp
240
1
Faceoff Leaders
Faceoff Leaders
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Sean Christman
30
14
Kevin Snyder
94
5
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Kyle Massimilian
79
15
Steven Cuccurullo
111
10
Nat'l Rank refers to the player's ranking nationally within the offensive/defensive/faceoff category. Change indicates how that ranking has changed in the past week. Check out all the leaders here.

Trending Up or Down

Boston U
Harvard
Stat
Season
Last 3 games
Season
Last 3 games
Record
3 - 3
2 - 1
2 - 2
1 - 2
Save Pct
53%
49%
57%
54%
Offensive Efficiency
23%
29%
34%
33%
Shooting Pct
28%
38%
36%
36%
Defensive Efficiency
25%
29%
29%
30%
Face-off Win%
61%
56%
44%
49%
Turnover Rate
45%
49%
45%
39%
Time-of-Possession
55%
55%
51%
49%
Avg Possession Length
37.5s
34.3s
49.2s
45.2s
Since we want to wait for sufficient games to have been played, we have compared each team's full season stats with a subset consisting of the last 3 games.

Boston U vs Harvard

Tale of the Tape

Stat
Boston U
Harvard
Strength of Rec.
46th
36th
Lax-ELO Rank
27th
48th
Adj Shooting %
51st
9th
Adj Efficiency
49th
21st
T.O.P.
38th
43rd
Roster Depth
13th
59th
Pace
2nd
27th

Team Pages

Quarter Breakdowns

Boston U: Season Stat Splits by Quarter
 
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Off Eff %
24.6%
23.4%
16.9%
25.0%
Scoring Margin
+1
-1
-7
+3
Shooting %
30%
32%
19%
31%
Turnover %
47.7%
46.8%
44.6%
41.2%
SOG %
48%
71%
56%
60%
TOP %
57%
56%
55%
50%
FO Win %
57%
63%
58%
71%
Time/Poss
46.0s
32.3s
40.9s
35.2s
Time to 1st
27.3s
30.3s
29.8s
31.1s
Shots/Poss
0.83
0.73
0.90
0.84
Def. Eff %
23.4%
27.1%
27.7%
22.6%
Save %
55.9%
45.7%
51.4%
58.8%
Harvard: Season Stat Splits by Quarter
 
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Off Eff %
38.2%
41.9%
26.5%
30.0%
Scoring Margin
+5
EVEN
EVEN
-3
Shooting %
41%
38%
28%
35%
Turnover %
50.0%
41.9%
52.9%
35.0%
SOG %
59%
68%
59%
74%
TOP %
52%
46%
53%
51%
FO Win %
38%
28%
42%
53%
Time/Poss
51.3s
56.6s
56.5s
42.2s
Time to 1st
36.6s
41.0s
46.8s
38.2s
Shots/Poss
0.95
1.11
0.93
0.88
Def. Eff %
22.9%
30.2%
23.7%
37.5%
Save %
72.4%
48.0%
64.0%
40.0%

EGA Leaders

Boston U
Offensive Leaders
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Vince DAlto
110
59
Louis Perfetto
184
64
Jake Cates
225
84
Defensive Leaders
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Chase Levesque
18
9
Reece Eddy
19
9
Collin Loughead
65
29
Faceoff Leaders
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Sean Christman
30
14
Kevin Snyder
94
5
Harvard
Offensive Leaders
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Austin Madronic
243
58
Kyle Anderson
309
51
Nick Loring
368
124
Defensive Leaders
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Beau Botkiss
205
45
Frankie Tangredi
229
17
David Strupp
240
1
Faceoff Leaders
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Kyle Massimilian
79
15
Steven Cuccurullo
111
10
Nat'l Rank refers to the player's ranking nationally within the offensive/defensive/faceoff category. Change indicates how that ranking has changed in the past week. Check out all the leaders here.
Win probability is an estimate based on the win percentage of every team that has been in a comparable time and score situation. We start with the basic time and score, then add or subtract win probability from each team depending on the recent sequence of plays and what that tells us about the likelihood that each team will score. Please, please, please do not treat this as a prediction. 90% win probability does not mean that the team has a 90% chance to win; it means that teams in the current situation have won 90% of the time. Win probabilities at the opening face-off are based on our current ELO ratings.

Either the game hasn't started yet or the streaming site is not sending data. Either way, we'll update this page once the stats start rolling in.

Team Pages