712
Binghamton Win Probability: 1.0%
Team Pages
Time Team Play BING Win Prob.
BING: 7DREX: 12
BING: 7DREX: 12
Q4 0:01 Assisted Goal 1.0%
Q4 0:01 Assisted Goal 1.0%
Q4 0:06 Good Clear 1.0%
Q4 0:06 Good Clear 1.0%
Q4 0:18 Unforced Turnover 1.1%
Q4 0:18 Unforced Turnover 1.1%
Q4 1:33 Faceoff Win 1.3%
Q4 1:33 Faceoff Win 1.3%
BING: 7DREX: 11
BING: 7DREX: 11
Q4 1:33 Assisted Goal 1.3%
Q4 1:33 Assisted Goal 1.3%
Q4 2:04 Faceoff Win 1.4%
Q4 2:04 Faceoff Win 1.4%
BING: 6DREX: 11
BING: 6DREX: 11
Q4 2:04 Unassisted Goal 1.4%
Q4 2:04 Unassisted Goal 1.4%
Q4 2:43 Penalty - 1 min 1.6%
Q4 2:43 Penalty - 1 min 1.6%
Q4 2:43 Saved Shot 1.6%
Q4 2:43 Saved Shot 1.6%
Q4 2:54 Missed Shot 1.6%
Q4 2:54 Missed Shot 1.6%
Q4 3:06 Missed Shot 1.6%
Q4 3:06 Missed Shot 1.6%
Q4 3:34 Faceoff Win 1.7%
Q4 3:34 Faceoff Win 1.7%
BING: 6DREX: 10
BING: 6DREX: 10
Q4 3:34 Unassisted Goal 1.7%
Q4 3:34 Unassisted Goal 1.7%
Q4 3:44 Missed Shot 1.8%
Q4 3:44 Missed Shot 1.8%
Q4 3:54 Missed Shot 1.8%
Q4 3:54 Missed Shot 1.8%
Q4 4:21 Good Clear 1.9%
Q4 4:21 Good Clear 1.9%
Q4 4:26 Unforced Turnover 1.9%
Q4 4:26 Unforced Turnover 1.9%
Q4 5:27 Unforced Turnover 3.3%
Q4 5:27 Unforced Turnover 3.3%
Q4 5:35 Ground Ball 2.1%
Q4 5:35 Ground Ball 2.1%
Q4 5:43 Missed Shot 2.2%
Q4 5:43 Missed Shot 2.2%
Q4 6:18 Good Clear 2.3%
Q4 6:18 Good Clear 2.3%
Q4 6:20 Ground Ball 3.6%
Q4 6:20 Ground Ball 3.6%
Q4 6:22 Saved Shot 4.6%
Q4 6:22 Saved Shot 4.6%
Q4 6:56 Good Clear 2.4%
Q4 6:56 Good Clear 2.4%
Q4 7:14 Saved Shot 2.5%
Q4 7:14 Saved Shot 2.5%
Q4 7:50 Good Clear 5.8%
Q4 7:50 Good Clear 5.8%
Show All Plays

Summary Stats
DREX
BING
Goals
12
7
Possessions
50
41
Shots
39
22
Shots-on-Goal
23
12
Off. Efficiency
24.0%
17.1%
Assist Rate
50%
43%
Save Pct
41.7%
47.8%
Shooting Percentage
30.8%
31.8%
Shot-on-goal Rate
59.0%
54.5%
Faceoff Win Rate
70.0%
30.0%
Turnovers
20
21
Failed Clears
2
4
Groundballs
9
4
Time of Possession
60.1%
39.9%
Avg. Possession Length
39.4
31.9
Time to First Shot
29.6
28.2
Shots per Possession
0.78
0.54
Number of Contributors
21
16
By Quarter: Drexel
 
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Goals
2
2
3
5
Possessions
13
13
14
10
Shots
10
4
10
15
Shots-on-Goal
5
2
7
9
Off. Efficiency
15%
15%
21%
50%
Save Pct
20%
67%
0%
67%
Shooting Percentage
20%
50%
30%
33%
Shot-on-goal Rate
50%
50%
70%
60%
Faceoff Win Rate
71%
33%
100%
67%
Groundball Win Rate
100%
25%
100%
67%
Turnover Rate
38%
46%
50%
20%
Time of Possession
62%
62%
56%
61%
Avg. Possession Length
34.6
40.8
33.9
51.3
Time to First Shot
29.5
35.3
25.6
31.1
Shots per Possession
0.77
0.31
0.71
1.50
Assist Rate
50%
50%
67%
40%
By Quarter: Binghamton
 
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Goals
4
1
1
1
Possessions
12
11
10
8
Shots
10
6
3
3
Shots-on-Goal
5
3
1
3
Off. Efficiency
33%
9%
10%
12%
Save Pct
60%
0%
57%
44%
Shooting Percentage
40%
17%
33%
33%
Shot-on-goal Rate
50%
50%
33%
100%
Faceoff Win Rate
29%
67%
0%
33%
Groundball Win Rate
0%
75%
0%
33%
Turnover Rate
33%
64%
60%
50%
Time of Possession
38%
38%
44%
39%
Avg. Possession Length
23.1
30.2
36.6
41.6
Time to First Shot
30.7
19.0
23.7
37.0
Shots per Possession
0.83
0.55
0.30
0.38
Assist Rate
50%
0%
0%
100%
Summary Stats
DREX
BING
Goals
12
7
Poss.
50
41
Shots
39
22
Shots-on-Goal
23
12
Off. Eff%
24.0%
17.1%
Assist %
50%
43%
Save Pct
41.7%
47.8%
Shooting %
30.8%
31.8%
SOG %
59.0%
54.5%
FO Win %
70.0%
30.0%
Turnovers
20
21
Failed Clears
2
4
Groundballs
9
4
T.O.P.
60.1%
39.9%
Avg Poss Length
39.4
31.9
Time to 1st Shot
29.6
28.2
Shots / Poss
0.78
0.54
# of Contributors
21
16
By Quarter: Drexel
 
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Goals
2
2
3
5
Poss.
13
13
14
10
Shots
10
4
10
15
SOG
5
2
7
9
Off. Eff%
15%
15%
21%
50%
Save Pct
20%
67%
0%
67%
Shooting %
20%
50%
30%
33%
SOG %
50%
50%
70%
60%
FO Win %
71%
33%
100%
67%
GB Win %
100%
25%
100%
67%
Turnover %
38%
46%
50%
20%
T.O.P.
62%
62%
56%
61%
Poss Len.
34.6
40.8
33.9
51.3
Time to 1st
29.5
35.3
25.6
31.1
Shots / Poss
0.77
0.31
0.71
1.50
Assist %
50%
50%
67%
40%
By Quarter: Binghamton
 
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Goals
4
1
1
1
Poss.
12
11
10
8
Shots
10
6
3
3
SOG
5
3
1
3
Off. Eff%
33%
9%
10%
12%
Save Pct
60%
0%
57%
44%
Shooting %
40%
17%
33%
33%
SOG %
50%
50%
33%
100%
FO Win %
29%
67%
0%
33%
GB Win %
0%
75%
0%
33%
Turnover %
33%
64%
60%
50%
T.O.P.
38%
38%
44%
39%
Poss Len.
23.1
30.2
36.6
41.6
Time to 1st
30.7
19.0
23.7
37.0
Shots / Poss
0.83
0.55
0.30
0.38
Assist %
50%
0%
0%
100%
Drexel Binghamton
Player EGA Player EGA
Drexel Binghamton
Player EGA Player EGA
Aidan Coll 4.59 Justin Roderka 2.99
Aidan Coll 4.59 Justin Roderka 2.99
Ryan Genord 3.51 Jackson Rieger 1.98
Ryan Genord 3.51 Jackson Rieger 1.98
Matt Varian 3.19 Kevin Winkoff 1.77
Matt Varian 3.19 Kevin Winkoff 1.77

[easy-tweet tweet="According to #LaxWP, @DrexelMLax currently has a 99.0% win probability against @BinghamtonMLAX" user="laxreference" url="https://lacrossereference.com/game-win-probabilities/binghamton_drexel_20200314/?utm_source=Social" template="light"]

LacrosseReference Preview: Binghamton vs Drexel

Tale of the Tape

Stat Category
Binghamton
Drexel
Strength of Record
61st
42nd
Lax-ELO Ranking
69th
29th
Adjusted Shooting %
67th
25th
Adjusted Efficiency
66th
16th
Time of Possession
51st
56th
Roster Depth
61st
14th
Pace
19th
30th

Team Pages

Style Comparison

Binghamton Offense
vs.
Drexel Defense
BING Off: on poss. lasting...
<30 sec.
30-59 sec.
60-80 sec.
Pct of Poss.
32.1%
41.6%
26.3%
Pct of Goals
35.0%
45.0%
20.0%
Efficiency
23.0%
22.8%
16.0%
Ranking
58th
61st
72nd
DREX Def: on poss. lasting...
<30 sec.
30-59 sec.
60-80 sec.
Efficiency
33.3%
23.7%
28.0%
Ranking
56th
17th
25th
Binghamton Defense
vs.
Drexel Offense
DREX Off: on poss. lasting...
<30 sec.
30-59 sec.
60-80 sec.
Pct of Poss.
26.2%
42.1%
31.8%
Pct of Goals
26.4%
31.9%
41.7%
Efficiency
33.9%
25.6%
44.1%
Ranking
19th
50th
3rd
BING Def: on poss. lasting...
<30 sec.
30-59 sec.
60-80 sec.
Efficiency
27.7%
27.5%
31.5%
Ranking
37th
31st
43rd

Quarter Breakdowns

Binghamton: Season Stat Splits by Quarter
 
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Offensive Efficiency
26.7%
18.8%
10.6%
21.2%
Scoring Margin
-1
-11
-17
-16
Shooting %
33%
22%
12%
25%
Turnover Rate
48.3%
68.8%
66.0%
53.8%
Shots-on-Goal %
60%
54%
54%
61%
Time-of-Possession
54%
48%
41%
46%
Faceoff Win Rate
45%
24%
32%
27%
Time/Possession
48.8s
55.5s
47.4s
48.5s
Time to First Shot
38.5s
39.9s
34.1s
32.7s
Shots per Possession
0.81
0.88
0.85
0.88
Defensive Efficiency
27.9%
28.6%
32.8%
36.5%
Save Pct
50.0%
60.8%
48.8%
38.6%
Drexel: Season Stat Splits by Quarter
 
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Offensive Efficiency
34.9%
38.0%
24.6%
41.0%
Scoring Margin
-1
+13
-7
+9
Shooting %
34%
34%
21%
40%
Turnover Rate
38.1%
39.4%
45.9%
39.3%
Shots-on-Goal %
62%
61%
53%
63%
Time-of-Possession
45%
54%
52%
44%
Faceoff Win Rate
37%
44%
65%
38%
Time/Possession
37.9s
41.7s
43.9s
36.6s
Time to First Shot
25.2s
32.2s
36.6s
25.8s
Shots per Possession
1.05
1.15
1.20
1.03
Defensive Efficiency
33.3%
22.2%
33.3%
25.8%
Save Pct
43.9%
54.8%
45.0%
51.5%

EGA Leaders

Binghamton
Drexel
Offensive Leaders
Offensive Leaders
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Thomas Greenblatt
170
81
Kevin Winkoff
203
8
Justin Roderka
352
56
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Ryan Genord
63
2
Matt Varian
68
31
Reid Bowering
81
90
Defensive Leaders
Defensive Leaders
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Tom Galgano
29
6
Dan Mottes
131
9
Max Napoli
217
47
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Sean Quinn
30
168
Luke Hurley
102
11
Brennan Greenwald
147
23
Faceoff Leaders
Faceoff Leaders
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Brandon Rizzuto
60
1
Drew Furlong
154
31
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Jimmeh Koita
21
6
Mark Hartmann
839
80
Nat'l Rank refers to the player's ranking nationally within the offensive/defensive/faceoff category. Change indicates how that ranking has changed in the past week. Check out all the leaders here.

Trending Up or Down

Binghamton
Drexel
Stat
Previous 3 games
Last 3 games
Previous 3 games
Last 3 games
Record
1 - 2
0 - 3
1 - 2
2 - 1
Save Pct
53%
49%
51%
44%
Offensive Efficiency
18%
22%
37%
32%
Shooting Pct
21%
26%
35%
29%
Defensive Efficiency
29%
33%
29%
29%
Face-off Win%
30%
38%
50%
39%
Turnover Rate
55%
62%
43%
38%
Time-of-Possession
46%
49%
53%
45%
Avg Possession Length
48.2s
48.1s
35.1s
41.9s

Binghamton vs Drexel

Tale of the Tape

Stat
Binghamton
Drexel
Strength of Rec.
61st
42nd
Lax-ELO Rank
69th
29th
Adj Shooting %
67th
25th
Adj Efficiency
66th
16th
T.O.P.
51st
56th
Roster Depth
61st
14th
Pace
19th
30th

Team Pages

Quarter Breakdowns

Binghamton: Season Stat Splits by Quarter
 
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Off Eff %
26.7%
18.8%
10.6%
21.2%
Scoring Margin
-1
-11
-17
-16
Shooting %
33%
22%
12%
25%
Turnover %
48.3%
68.8%
66.0%
53.8%
SOG %
60%
54%
54%
61%
TOP %
54%
48%
41%
46%
FO Win %
45%
24%
32%
27%
Time/Poss
48.8s
55.5s
47.4s
48.5s
Time to 1st
38.5s
39.9s
34.1s
32.7s
Shots/Poss
0.81
0.88
0.85
0.88
Def. Eff %
27.9%
28.6%
32.8%
36.5%
Save %
50.0%
60.8%
48.8%
38.6%
Drexel: Season Stat Splits by Quarter
 
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Off Eff %
34.9%
38.0%
24.6%
41.0%
Scoring Margin
-1
+13
-7
+9
Shooting %
34%
34%
21%
40%
Turnover %
38.1%
39.4%
45.9%
39.3%
SOG %
62%
61%
53%
63%
TOP %
45%
54%
52%
44%
FO Win %
37%
44%
65%
38%
Time/Poss
37.9s
41.7s
43.9s
36.6s
Time to 1st
25.2s
32.2s
36.6s
25.8s
Shots/Poss
1.05
1.15
1.20
1.03
Def. Eff %
33.3%
22.2%
33.3%
25.8%
Save %
43.9%
54.8%
45.0%
51.5%

EGA Leaders

Binghamton
Offensive Leaders
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Thomas Greenblatt
170
81
Kevin Winkoff
203
8
Justin Roderka
352
56
Defensive Leaders
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Tom Galgano
29
6
Dan Mottes
131
9
Max Napoli
217
47
Faceoff Leaders
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Brandon Rizzuto
60
1
Drew Furlong
154
31
Drexel
Offensive Leaders
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Ryan Genord
63
2
Matt Varian
68
31
Reid Bowering
81
90
Defensive Leaders
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Sean Quinn
30
168
Luke Hurley
102
11
Brennan Greenwald
147
23
Faceoff Leaders
Player
Nat'l Rank
Change
Jimmeh Koita
21
6
Mark Hartmann
839
80
Nat'l Rank refers to the player's ranking nationally within the offensive/defensive/faceoff category. Change indicates how that ranking has changed in the past week. Check out all the leaders here.
Win probability is an estimate based on the win percentage of every team that has been in a comparable time and score situation. We start with the basic time and score, then add or subtract win probability from each team depending on the recent sequence of plays and what that tells us about the likelihood that each team will score. Please, please, please do not treat this as a prediction. 90% win probability does not mean that the team has a 90% chance to win; it means that teams in the current situation have won 90% of the time. Win probabilities at the opening face-off are based on our current ELO ratings.

Either the game hasn't started yet or the streaming site is not sending data. Either way, we'll update this page once the stats start rolling in.

Team Pages